This needs to be addressed now so everyone will know of this terrible lady’s background – one that is mired in scandal after scandal and none have stuck to her or her husband, Bill Clinton. One has to wonder why this is, and few could ever know just how the scandals have seemed to just fade away. But, like Obama, Hillary Clinton seems to be able to create a scandal and then move on to another one before any time is spent to really investigate the first.
Now, let us supply what background we can in as short an article as possible.
Let us begin with her birthplace, Park Ridge, Illinois—she was born in Chicago. Why does that sound familiar? Maybe because, in recent times, it seems that a lot of Communist/Socialists have come from that area. Anyway, she left there to go to Massachusetts at Wellesley College where her political vies would change to Democrat, or maybe a more modern term of Socialist/Communist. Her views would move to the extreme left after reading an article titled, “Change or Containment,” authored by one Carl Oglesby, who was a Marxist/Maoist theoretician and the leader of Students for a Democratic Society. In this article he defended Ho Chi Min, Fidel Castro, and the Maoist acts of violence. Hillary said that the article was instrumental to her moving from a Goldwater Republican to an extreme left Democrat (it should be mentioned that this type of Democrat identifies themselves with words such as “progressive” or “left,” but seldom with their true identity, “Communist/Socialist”). She even told a reporter that she still held respect for the Oglesby article, she made that statement in her first year of being First Lady, thus expression her true Socialist/Communist ideology. But this is only the tip of the proverbial Iceberg.
In our previous article, we show the following:
“Hillary Clinton is a lady many despise and many love. But just what does anyone know about her background and how it relates to the United States? Her background has some really radical people in it, and one particular individual is none other than Saul Alinsky. Now, many have to wonder just who is this Saul Alinsky? Now we do have to give a brief background on him, since it is his ideology that Hillary Clinton grew up loving. The first thing we have to present is his famous book, “Rules For Radicals,” of which Hillary even wrote a letter to him asking when it would be out, as she so lightly stated in her letter to Saul Alinsky, dated July 8, 1971.
When is that new book coming out—or has it come out and I somehow missed the fulfillment of Revelation? I have just had my one-thousandth conversation about Reveille and need some new material to throw at people. You are being rediscovered again as the New Left-type politicos are finally beginning to think seriously about the hard work and mechanics of organizing. I seem to have survived law school, alightly bruised, with my belief and zest for organizing intact. If I never thanked you for the encouraging words of last spring in the midst of the Yale-Columbia madness, I do so now. The more I’ve seen places like Yale Law School and the people who haunt them, the more I am convinced I am that we have the serious business and joy of such work ahead, –if the commitment to a free and open society is ever going to mean more than eloquence and frustration.
I miss our biennial conversations. Do you ever make it out to California? I am living in Berkeley and working in Oakland for the summer and would love to see you. Let me know if there is any chance of our getting together—2667 Derby #2, Berkeley 415-841-5330.”
(See the entire letter)
Let us inform you of just who this Saul Alinsky is that Hillary Clinton is trying to meet in California. We will make this brief, since including Saul Alinsky’s history and how it goes against the Constitution would take up many pages, which we will do in a book soon.
Saul Alinsky was born to Russian-Jewish parents in Chicago in 1909, Saul Alinsky was a Communist/Marxist fellow-traveler who helped establish the tactics of infiltration — coupled with a measure of confrontation — that have been central to revolutionary political movements in the United States in recent decades. He never joined the Communist Party, but instead, as David Horowitz puts it, became an avatar of the post-modern left.
Saul Alinsky has been identified as such:
- Identified a set of very specific rules that ordinary citizens could follow, and tactics that ordinary citizens could employ, as a means of gaining public power
- Created a blueprint for revolution under the banner of “social change”
- Two of his most notable modern-day disciples are Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
As Alinsky put it: “A reformation means that the masses of our people have reached the point of disillusionment with past ways and values. They don’t know what will work but they do know that the prevailing system is self-defeating, frustrating, and hopeless. They won’t act for change but won’t strongly oppose those who do. The time is then ripe for revolution.”
 Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals (New York: Vintage Books), March 1972 edition, p. xxii. (Original publication was in 1971.)
Now, with her letter, part of which is shown above from the site, we could ask just what type of person Hillary Clinton is. It would seem to show that she is a closet Socialist/Communist at best, or maybe an individual who has the same type of “Rules For Radicals” in her head to toss out upon the people of the United States. Much could be stated about what Hillary Clinton may plan to do, should she win the 2016 Presidential election, but one thing is for sure: her idea of the United States is not the same as the honest, working citizen’s. Her ideas are lined with dreams of an “Alinsky” style of not just government, but nation—one that has the Constitution trampled upon.
Allen West wrote the article cited above, and in it are the total copies of the letters both to and from Saul Alinsky in relation to Hilary Clinton. We should have extreme questions about this, no matter where one sits on the sides of politics, since her ideas seem to stem from the teachings of Saul Alinsky whose ideology was to destroy the United States and turn it into a “Socialist” state. Obama had the Communist Party of the United States support him, not just as President, but also when he ran for Illinois Senator. It would seem that, since Hillary Clinton comes from that same distinct area, maybe she, too, stands to obtain the support of the Communist Party!”
We feel that the more people that know about Hillary Clinton’s links to Socialists, Communists, thugs, criminals, and the like, the better it will be.
Hillary Rodham wrote a 92 page senior thesis in 1969 at Wellesley on the theories of her most admired man, Saul Alinsky. Hillary even met with Alinsky several times in 1968 and stated:
“Alinsky is regarded by many as the proponent of a dangerous socio/political philosophy. As such, he has been feared — just as Eugene Debs [the five-time Socialist Party candidate for U.S. President] or Walt Whitman or Martin Luther King has been feared, because each embraced the most radical of political faiths — democracy.”
Her conclusion also included this sentence: “If the ideals Alinsky espouses were actualized, the result would be social revolution.”
This shows just how Left and Communist-thinking Hillary Clinton is, and her idea to run for president is one of the worst things that could ever happen. Hillary Clinton has the following scandals lined up behind her with the most recent being the Benghazi scandal where she has yet to answer any questions about the murder of 4 brave men.
- Rose Law Firm
- Vince Foster
- Representing a rapist
These have never been looked into by an independent individual, and like most of Obama’s scandals, they never seem to have been brought to a solution that tells all about them.
But let us get back to her deep involvement with Saul Alinsky, one that was so deep, that Saul Alinsky gave her a job.
“When Hillary graduated from Wellesley in 1969, she was offered a job with Alinsky’s Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF) in Chicago. She opted instead to enroll at Yale Law School. Nevertheless, she would maintain her allegiance to Alinsky’s teachings throughout her adult life. She also continued to correspond with him, as the two maintained a very friendly relationship steeped in mutual admiration. In a letter dated July 8, 1971, Hillary penned a letter to Alnsky that began: “Dear Saul, When is that new book [Rules for Radicals] coming out—or has it come and I somehow missed the fulfillment of Revelation? I have just had my one-thousandth conversation about Reveille [for Radicals] and need some new material to throw at people. You are being rediscovered again as the New Left-type politicos are finally beginning to think seriously about the hard work and mechanics of organizing. I seem to have survived law school, slightly bruised, with my belief in and zest for organizing intact.”
According to a March 2007 Washington Post report: “As first lady, Clinton occasionally lent her name to projects endorsed by the [IAF]…. She raised money and attended two events organized by the Washington Interfaith Network, an IAF affiliate.”
Hillary went on to Yale Law School where she did the following:
One of Hillary’s Yale professors, Thomas Emerson (known as “Tommy the Commie”), introduced her to the aforementioned Charles Garry. Garry helped Hillary get personally involved in the defense of several Black Panthers (including the notorious Bobby Seale) who were then being tried in New Haven, Connecticut for the torture, murder, and mutilation of one of their own members. Though evidence of the defendants’ guilt was overwhelming, Hillary — as part of her coursework for Professor Emerson — attended the Panther trials and arranged for shifts of fellow students to likewise monitor court proceedings and report on any civil-rights abuses allegedly suffered by the defendants. (Those abuses could then be used, if the Panthers were to lose their case, as grounds for appeal.) Striving to neutralize what she considered the pervasive racism of the American legal system, “Hillary was,” as Barbara Olson observed in Hell to Pay, “a budding Leninist.”
Barbara Olson, Hell to Pay (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, 1999), pp. 59-59.
Ibid., pp. 56, 62.
But Hillary Rodham went on to the famed school many see in the riots in California today, Berkley inn 1972 where she worked for a “COMMUNIST supported” law firm.
“Also in 1972, she went to Berkeley to work as an intern at her hand-picked law firm: Treuhaft, Walker, and Bernstein. Founded by current or former members of the Communist Party USA, this firm had long acted as a legal asset not only for the CPUSA but also for the Black Panthers and other Bay-area radicals. Founding partner Bob Treuhaft, head of the California Communist Party, had been labeled one of the nation’s most “dangerously subversive” lawyers. According to historian Stephen Schwartz, “Treuhaft is a man who dedicated his entire legal career to advancing the agenda of the Soviet Communist Party and the KGB.” Hillary did yeoman’s work while learning at the feet of Treuhaft and his fellow masters. Associates say that Hillary, during her tenure with the firm, helped draftees get themselves declared conscientious objectors so they could avoid serving in Vietnam; they also contend that Hillary served VA interns seeking to avoid taking a loyalty oath to the United States.
Also in the early 1970s, Hillary developed a close acquaintanceship with Robert Borosage, who would later become a major figure in such leftist organizations as the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), the Campaign for America’s Future, and Institute for America’s Future. Hillary herself (along with Bill Clinton) would go on to develop close political ties with IPS; moreover, she would give that organization a great deal of money to further its cause.”
More Communist-affiliated programs, and agencies. Nice to know that this lady wants to run for the President of the United States when she is actually a Communist in sheep’s clothing!
We could go on with so much more, but we have just shown the very tip of Hillary Rodham Clinton and her ideology is much worse than anything Obama has done and to have her as a President would be like giving the White House to the Communist Party of America and her appointments would come from some of the most far left groups associated with the Communist Party and the Socialist Party. If you do not believe this woman is evil just go here, where you can read everything that should be shown.
We will be doing an article on the Democratic Party’s next favorite person, should Hillary Clinton fail to succeed in becoming President—that is, Elizabeth Warren, who is almost as bad as Hillary.
Don’t forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.