• ← Back to INVESTOR TIMES
  • Investing Articles
  • Financial Markets News
  • Tech News
  • Cryptocurrencies News
Progress Report
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Progress Report
No Result
View All Result

June Primary Will Decide Environmental Balance in Legislature

Progress Report by Progress Report
May 23, 2006
in California Progress Report
0

susan_smartt.gif

Most voters do not realize the importance of voting in the election that is now just two weeks away. The crucial tipping point for electing pro-environment candidates is in the election on June 6th. Because virtually all of California’s legislative districts favor one party or the other, the key races will be decided during the primaries. Most of the forty open seats in the State Senate and Assembly will not change party hands; for that reason, the California League of Conservation Voters (CLCV) is helping the best environmental leaders win in June. See the chart below: Best- and worst-case scenarios.

Term limits guarantee the California Legislature will look very different after the 2006 elections; a full one-third of the seats in the Assembly and State Senate are open this year.

Our success in electing pro-environmental candidates in 2006 is likely to determine California’s environmental health for years to come, because in the next few years, the legislature will make critical decisions regarding global warming, coastal protection, affordable housing, development, wildlife management, and energy resources. To ensure that California remains an environmental leader, we must maximize our electoral gains in 2006.

The long list of environmental champions who have been “termed out” of the legislature, taking their legislative acumen with them, will get longer. The result is that legions of entrenched lobbyists for the state’s biggest polluters retain the majority of experience and institutional knowledge in Sacramento. CLCV is helping offset that trend by supporting candidates who will dedicate themselves to defending all Californians’ resources and well-being.

In the Legislature, the reality today is that only the Senate has a working environmental majority. In the Assembly, just enough Democrats join Republicans to block the most important environmental legislation. The environmental community relied on the Senate to stop bad bills in 2005 and had to fight hard in the Assembly to get the 41 votes needed to send good bills to the Governor’s desk. Frankly, not many got there.

The 2006 election brings the daunting prospect of losing the reliable environmental majority in Senate. There is an opportunity to gain a modest number of reliable environmental votes in the Assembly, though anti-environmental Democrats may still hold enough seats to block pro-environmental legislation.

These scenarios don’t necessarily mean that the prospects for important environmental bills are bleak. They do mean that it’s likely we’ll have to battle with polluters for key votes from the most fickle lawmakers in both houses.

CLCV plays a key role in electing environmental leaders by interviewing and endorsing the best candidates statewide. We invite every viable candidate for every open seat to participate in our endorsement process, regardless of party, by sending them questionnaires.

Unfortunately, only one out of 37 Republican candidates running for 13 open safe Republican seats elected to participate by responding. Disturbingly, this seems to indicate that Republicans in the Legislature, who are averaging less than 5% support on key environmental votes, will not appreciably improve in 2006.

On the Democratic side, we face the possible loss of the working environmental majority in the Senate and continued stalemate in the Assembly. Based on our analysis of who is running for which seat, the following scenarios are likely:

Senate

Current reliable pro-environmental Senate votes: 20
Number needed to pass or defeat legislation: 21
Potential losses of reliable Senate votes: 7
Potential gains over existing poor environmental votes: 0
Best case outcome—Total environmental votes: 18
Worst case outcome—Total environmental votes: 13

Assembly

Current reliable pro-environmental Assembly votes: 27
Number needed to pass or defeat legislation: 41
Potential losses of reliable Assembly votes: 3
Potential gains over existing poor environmental votes: 10
Best case outcome—Total environmental votes: 38
Worst case outcome—Total environmental votes: 28

The California League of Conservation Voters is exerting a full court press to support California’s future environmental leaders:

• We have gotten out in front and made early endorsements for great candidates in the most important races.
• We are sending resources and staff to key campaigns.
• We are spreading the message to CLCV members and other Californians statewide.

We can only maximize our gains and win these tough primary election contests if you and everyone you know vote on June 6th for CLCV’s endorsed candidates. Your votes, your calls and letters, and your support for CLCV are critical in preserving democracy for the people and our environment for generations to come.

Previous Post

California Exit Exam Fails Kids and the State

Next Post

The California Tax Reform Association “Tax Policy for the 21st Century” is our site of the day

Next Post

The California Tax Reform Association “Tax Policy for the 21st Century” is our site of the day

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About Progress Report

The content of this site has been restored on a non-profit basis to preserve knowledge and serve as a historical archive. All articles were originally published on californiaprogressreport.com and belong to their respective authors.

California Progress Report was an independent journal published to cover vital public policy issues and offer a public service.

Latest posts

  • Who’s to Blame for Oil Waste in Californians’ Drinking Water?
  • The Unintended Side Effects of Fighting Prescription Drug Abuse
  • The Year in Sustainable Food: Much Progress, and More Work to Be Done
  • Can We Have Bank and Regulator Hearings in California Too?
  • Massive Dumping of Wastewater Into Aquifers Shows Big Oil’s Power in California

InvestorTimes.com

InvestorTimes.com is a privately funded financial publication particularly created for professional and personal investors and intellectually restless individuals.

Our raison d'être is to provide insightful information to any citizen willing to understand global economical markets and the most relevant current affairs.

Contact us: info@investortimes.com

WE ARE LOOKING FOR TALENT

INVESTOR TIMES is always open to the incorporation of talent in its team of journalists and editors. If you would like to be part of our project as a collaborator, we invite you to submit your application.

Contact us: talent@investortimes.com

INTERNATIONAL EDITIONS

Investor Times en Français

Investor Times in Deutsch

Investor Times in Italiano

Investor Times em Português

Investor Times po Polsku

Investor Times на русском языке

El País Financiero (edición en Español)

DMCA.com Protection Status

  • ← Back to INVESTOR TIMES
  • Investing Articles
  • Financial Markets News
  • Tech News
  • Cryptocurrencies News

© INVESTOR TIMES

No Result
View All Result
  • LoginPress

© INVESTOR TIMES